Massachusetts-Specific Patient Information

Massachusetts-Specific Patient Information

By

Daniel Newman

Jul 12, 2025

Massachusetts-specific Patient Information

The following information is specific to Massachusetts and provides additional patient rights and protections under state law.

Patient Rights & Options Under Massachusetts Law

Partial prescription fills for certain controlled medications: Under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 94C, Section 22(c) (regarding partial fills of Schedule II medications), patients have the right to request partial fills of certain Schedule II prescriptions. While this law was created with pain management in mind, it reflects a statewide commitment to medication safety and patient empowerment that we support in our mental health practice. For psychiatric medications like stimulants, this means:

  • Your choice: You can request to fill only part of your prescribed stimulant medication rather than the full amount

  • How it works: You can fill the remainder of your prescription later, up to the total amount prescribed

  • Benefits: Reduces medication in your home, lowers risk of theft or diversion, and gives you more control over your ADHD treatment

  • Practical application: This might be useful when starting a new stimulant medication or when concerned about storage security

  • No pressure: This is your choice - you are not required to use partial fills if you prefer to fill the complete prescription

Electronic Prescription Requirements

Massachusetts law (MGL Chapter 94C, Section 1, defining electronic prescribing requirements) defines specific requirements for electronic prescriptions:

  • Enhanced security: Electronic prescriptions must meet federal requirements under the DEA's EPCS rules for controlled substances to prevent fraud and ensure accuracy

  • Direct transmission: Prescriptions are sent directly from your healthcare provider to your pharmacy electronically

  • Patient benefits: Reduces errors, prevents prescription tampering, and speeds up the pharmacy process

  • What to expect: Your healthcare provider will send your prescription electronically rather than giving you a paper prescription for most controlled substances

Authorized Prescribers in Massachusetts

Massachusetts law (MGL Chapter 94C, Section 1, defining authorized practitioners) recognizes a broad range of healthcare providers who may prescribe controlled substances when appropriate for your care:

Medical Practitioners:

  • Physicians (medical doctors) – [MD, DO, MBBS]

  • Dentists [DDS, DMD]

  • Veterinarians (for animal patients)

  • Podiatrists (foot and ankle specialists)

Advanced Practice Providers:

  • Nurse practitioners: Registered nurses with advanced training authorized to prescribe medications

  • Nurse anesthetists: Specialized nurses who manage anesthesia and pain control

  • Psychiatric nurse mental health clinical specialists: Advanced practice nurses specializing in mental health treatment

Specialized Providers:

  • Optometrists: Eye care professionals authorized to prescribe certain therapeutic medications for eye conditions

  • Physician assistants: Healthcare providers who work under physician supervision

  • Institutional providers: Hospitals and healthcare facilities & Registered pharmacies (for dispensing)

Massachusetts Controlled Substance Scheduling

Massachusetts uses a dual system for classifying controlled substances (MGL Chapter 94C, Section 2, establishing state scheduling authority):

  • Federal scheduling: Massachusetts incorporates the five federal schedules (I-V) described earlier in this document

  • State classification system: Massachusetts also uses Classes A, B, C, D, and E that correspond to federal schedules

  • Additional state schedule: Massachusetts includes a sixth schedule that covers prescription drugs not included in the first five federal schedules

What does this mean for patients:

  • Your medications are regulated under both federal and state laws

  • This dual system provides additional oversight and patient protections

  • Healthcare providers must comply with both federal and Massachusetts requirements

  • The scheduling helps ensure appropriate medical supervision for different types of medications

Massachusetts Patient Protections

Prescription Monitoring:

  • Massachusetts maintains a prescription monitoring program to enhance patient safety

  • Helps prevent dangerous drug interactions and ensures coordinated care

  • Protects patients from receiving incompatible medications from different providers

Quality Assurance:

  • State licensing and oversight of healthcare providers and pharmacies

  • Regular inspection and monitoring of facilities that handle controlled substances

  • Established procedures for reporting and addressing concerns about patient care

Legal Protection:

  • Clear definitions of legitimate medical use versus non-medical use

  • Protection for patients who use medications as prescribed for legitimate medical conditions

  • Established procedures for healthcare providers to ensure appropriate prescribing

Resources and Support

If you have questions about your rights:

  • Discuss concerns with your healthcare provider

  • Contact the Massachusetts Department of Public Health for general information about controlled substance regulations

  • Consult with your pharmacist about prescription options and requirements

If you need treatment for substance use concerns:

  • Massachusetts offers various treatment resources and support programs

  • Treatment for substance use disorder is considered healthcare, not a criminal matter

  • Many insurance plans cover substance use disorder treatment

For prescription-related issues:

  • Board of Registration in Pharmacy handles pharmacy-related concerns

  • Board of Registration in Medicine addresses physician-related issues

  • Your healthcare provider can help coordinate with appropriate state agencies if needed



Disclaimer: This article is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be considered medical advice or a substitute for individualized healthcare. All content published on PsychConcierge.com is reviewed and approved for clinical accuracy, though individual author perspectives may vary within our care team. Information is current as of the publication date and may be updated without notice. For personalized guidance, please consult a qualified mental health professional. If you are experiencing a mental health crisis or emergency, please call 911 or contact the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988.

Daniel Newman

Managing Clinician

More Insights

Forensics

O'Connor v. Donaldson

O’Connor v. Donaldson (1975) limits civil commitment by requiring both dangerousness and justification for continued confinement. This article examines how the decision reshapes clinical assessments, expert testimony, and the boundary between care and custody.

Daniel Newman

Feb 26, 2026

Forensics

Addington v. Texas

Addington v. Texas establishes that involuntary civil commitment requires clear and convincing evidence of both mental illness and dangerousness, setting the constitutional due process standard for confinement decisions in the United States (Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 1979). This landmark ruling shapes forensic psychiatric evaluations, legal documentation, and clinical risk assessment by balancing individual liberty interests with the state’s duty to protect and treat.

Daniel Newman

Feb 24, 2026

Practice Theory

Deciduous and Coniferous Personality Orientations: A Metaphor for Plasticity and Stability in Personality Dynamics

Deciduous and coniferous personality orientations as an ecological metaphor grounded in Big Five Openness and Conscientiousness, Plasticity and Stability metatraits, and Cybernetic Big Five Theory, accompanied by a mixed-methods validation study using the Deciduous-Coniferous Personality Inventory to test incremental predictive validity for coping flexibility, person-environment fit, and health outcomes in emerging adults.

Daniel Newman

Feb 20, 2026

Forensics

Bridging the Gap Between Forensic Reports and Clinical Practice

This analysis draws on Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (DMH) Designated Forensic Professional (DFP) training materials, including the Chapter 123, Section 15(b) Report Writing Manual, practice guidelines on confidentiality notifications, ultimate issue opinions, report de-identification, committee advisories on care-and-treatment recommendations, and correctional transition.

Daniel Newman

Feb 19, 2026

Accessible mental health care. Personalized approach. Enduring progress.

Accessible mental health care. Personalized approach. Enduring progress.

Accessible mental health care. Personalized approach. Enduring progress.

Contact:

© 2025 PsychConcierge. All rights reserved.